netfilter: bpf: reject invalid NAT manipulation types
CVSS score
—
EPSS probability
—
Risk score
—
Published
15 h ago
Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Impact on My Inventory
Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.
Checking session…
Vulnerability description
CVE AI research
DayBreach AI Explanation
Verified against sourcesSources read
2
Source agreement
Tam uyum
Evidence confidence
%63
Short explanation
CVE-2026-98793 in the Linux kernel netfilter bpf subsystem stems from bpf_ct_set_nat_info() failing to validate NAT manipulation types. This flaw allows incorrect values to pass to nf_nat_setup_info(), triggering WARN_ON() and potential conntrack cleanup issues. The patch status is listed as UNKNOWN.
Unvalidated NAT manipulation types can trigger unexpected kernel warnings and uninitialized node cleanup operations, making it important to review and properly validate inputs within netfilter bpf configurations.
What should be done?
- Follow the vendor advisory
- Apply updates that validate NAT manipulation types before calling nf_nat_setup_info
Chain of evidence and sources
bpf_ct_set_nat_info fonksiyonu NAT manipülasyon türünü doğrulamamaktadır.
Geçersiz değerler nf_nat_setup_info fonksiyonuna aktarılarak WARN_ON tetiklenebilir.
Yama durumu UNKNOWN olarak bildirilmiştir.
Show the technical text from the sources
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bpf: reject invalid NAT manipulation types As bpf_ct_set_nat_info() is not validating the NAT manipulation type a wrong value can be passed directly to nf_nat_setup_info(). This triggers the WARN_ON() at nf_nat_setup_info() and if panic_on_warn isn't set, then IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE is set without adding nat_bysource and conntrack cleanup tries to unlink an uninitialized hlist node. Fix this by checking that NAT manipulation type is correct before calling nf_nat_setup_info(). In addition, if the WARN_ON is hit, return NF_DROP instead of continuing with the processing to avoid similar situations in the future.
Explanation produced with the local gemini-flash-lite-latest model. Numerical metrics and the KEV, patch and exploit statuses are not determined by AI.
IMPACT: Affected Products and Software
RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check
SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.
| SCORE | VERSION | SEVERITY | VECTOR | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The sources have not yet published a verified CVSS metric. | ||||
Patch and Remediation Guide
Solution & Remediation Advisory
İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Public exploit and active exploitation status
Verified exploit intelligence
No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.
Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-98793 is associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-98793 weaknesses.
Official Sources and Advisories
Yama durumu bilinmiyor
Similar Vulnerabilities
Get this vulnerability through the API
Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.
curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \ "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-98793"