scsi: libiscsi: Validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU
CVSS score
—
EPSS probability
—
Risk score
—
Published
3 h ago
Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Impact on My Inventory
Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.
Checking session…
Vulnerability description
DayBreach CVE AI Research
CVE-2026-99153 has vendor, distribution, patch and security-source records on file. We can compare them and prepare an explanation linked to the evidence.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi: Validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU A Reject PDU carries a copy of the header it rejects, and iscsi_handle_reject() takes the ITT out of that copy to find the task to clean up: memcpy(&rejected_pdu, data, sizeof(struct iscsi_hdr)); ... task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt); That value is whatever the target put there. iscsi_itt_to_task() bounds the index against cmds_max and checks nothing else, so any task in the pool can be named, and iscsi_nop_out_rsp() then completes it. An index that has never been used gives a NULL task->conn: the pool is zeroed at session setup and conn is assigned only when a task is allocated. If the task was used and returned, iscsi_complete_task() hits its WARN_ON_ONCE(task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE) and the refcount underflows. An in-flight SCSI command is completed as successful - a 1 MiB read returned 1048576 with none of its buffer written and no warning. Validate the reflected ITT the way iscsi_itt_to_ctask() validates a command ITT, and require the task to be in flight and not a SCSI command. [ 6.248477] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000c: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 6.249357] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000060-0x0000000000000067] [ 6.249951] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 7.2.0-rc5-ISCSI1-gf5098b6bae76 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 6.250718] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 6.251616] RIP: 0010:iscsi_nop_out_rsp.constprop.0+0x46/0x160 [ 6.252043] Code: c1 ea 03 48 83 ec 08 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 f5 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8b 6b 58 48 8d 7d 60 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 c0 00 00 00 48 8b 45 60 48 39 c3 74 50 48 b8 00 [ 6.252813] RSP: 0018:ffff88806c907b80 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 6.253042] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88800607e000 RCX: ffffffff8d571a25 [ 6.253345] RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: ffff88806c907c38 RDI: 0000000000000060 [ 6.253642] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff235a504 [ 6.253947] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 7463656e6e6f6320 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254251] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88806c907c38 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254549] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d95bc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6.254887] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6.255140] CR2: 00007fc393e8ffc0 CR3: 0000000005252006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 6.255439] PKRU: 55555554 [ 6.255564] Call Trace: [ 6.255674] <IRQ> [ 6.255768] __iscsi_complete_pdu+0x18bf/0x22a0 [ 6.256733] iscsi_complete_pdu+0x54/0xa0 [ 6.256905] iscsi_tcp_data_recv_done+0xf4/0x250 [ 6.257103] iscsi_tcp_recv_skb+0x31e/0xec0 [ 6.257680] iscsi_sw_tcp_recv+0x12f/0x390 [ 6.258061] __tcp_read_sock+0x1ab/0x810 [ 6.258853] iscsi_sw_tcp_data_ready+0x18b/0x510 [ 6.259808] tcp_data_queue+0x1f13/0x4cd0 [ 6.260567] tcp_rcv_established+0x8a5/0x3a00 [ 6.261931] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x449/0x960 [ 6.262269] tcp_v4_rcv+0x2245/0x3bc0
IMPACT: Affected Products and Software
RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check
SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.
| SCORE | VERSION | SEVERITY | VECTOR | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The sources have not yet published a verified CVSS metric. | ||||
Patch and Remediation Guide
Solution & Remediation Advisory
İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Public exploit and active exploitation status
Verified exploit intelligence
No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.
Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-99153 is associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-99153 weaknesses.
Official Sources and Advisories
Yama durumu bilinmiyor
Similar Vulnerabilities
Get this vulnerability through the API
Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.
curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \ "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-99153"