Back to the CVE list
CVE-2026-119192

Forge: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature forgery via non-canonical DigestInfo encoding

CVSS score

7.5

EPSS probability

—

Risk score

0.8

Published

8 h ago

Patch status has not yet been verified

Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Impact on My Inventory

Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.

Checking session…

Vulnerability description

DayBreach AI Explanation

Verified against sources

Signature Forgery Vulnerability in CVE-2026-119192

Sources read

1

Source agreement

Tam uyum

Evidence confidence

%53

Short explanation

The RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature verification mechanism in the node-forge library accepts non-canonical BER encodings for DigestInfo. This allows signature forgery when using RSA keys with a low public exponent.

Why does it matter?

This vulnerability allows attackers to forge signatures without the private key, bypassing integrity checks and potentially leading to the manipulation of trusted data.

What should be done?

  • Do not use RSA keys with a low public exponent (e=3) for signature verification.
  • Follow the vendor advisory for updates.
Note on uncertainty

The sources give limited detail on some technical conditions. Review the chain of evidence below before deciding how to act.

Chain of evidence and sources2 verified claims

RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 imza doğrulama rutini, DigestInfo için kurallara uymayan BER kodlamalarını kabul etmektedir.

Düşük genel üsse (e=3) sahip RSA anahtarları için özel anahtar olmadan imza sahteciliği yapılabilir.

Show the technical text from the sources

### Summary RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature verification (`publicKey.verify()` with the default scheme, also used by X.509 certificate and PKCS#7 verification) accepted non-canonical BER encodings of the DigestInfo, such as NULL parameters with content and non-minimal lengths. These leave attacker-controlled bytes inside an accepted DigestInfo, which allows signatures to be forged without the private key for RSA keys with a low public exponent (e=3). Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. ### Details In `lib/rsa.js`, `key.verify()` with the default `RSASSA-PKCS1-V1_5` scheme removes the padding, parses the recovered DigestInfo with the lenient BER parser `asn1.fromDer()` and checks its structure with `asn1.validate()` against `digestInfoValidator`. Neither requires a canonical DER encoding, so verification accepted, among others: - NULL parameters with content bytes (e.g. `05 40 <64 bytes>`) - non-NULL or constructed values in the parameters position - non-minimal (long form) and indefinite lengths - non-canonical OID encodings (padded subidentifiers, trailing bytes) These leave attacker-controlled bytes inside an accepted DigestInfo. For RSA keys with a low public exponent (e=3) this allows signatures to be forged without the private key (BERserk / Bleichenbacher-style forgery, see CVE-2014-1568). RFC 8017 section 8.2.2 verifies a signature by encoding the expected EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 message and comparing it with the recovered one; section 9.2 defines the DigestInfo encoding. The fix adds `_encodeDigestInfo()`, which DER-encodes the expected DigestInfo from the digest algorithm OID and the digest (with and without NULL parameters). Verification now requires the recovered DigestInfo to match one of these encodings byte for byte. The same change fixes GHSA-2g46-22mc-6gwp (CVE-2026-85393). #### Patches Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. Verification now re-encodes the expected DigestInfo and requires a byte-for-byte match (RFC 8017 section 8.2.2). #### Workarounds Do not use RSA keys with a low public exponent (e=3) for signature verification. #### References - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017#section-8.2.2 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017#section-9.2 - CVE-2026-85393 / GHSA-2g46-22mc-6gwp (related, same fix) - CVE-2026-33894 / https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp - https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-1568 (BERserk) #### Severity CVSS 3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N (7.5, High) CVSS 4.0 (informational): CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N (8.2) Both versions rate this High. The severity rating follows CVSS 3.1. #### Credits Independently reported by Oren Yomtov (@orenyomtov, Fireblocks), Bronson Yen (Calif.io, in collaboration with Claude and Anthropic Research), Kamil Hałajda, @pzartech, @antonlissone and @Brechard. ### Proof of concept DigestInfo encodings accepted before 1.4.1 (SHA-256; OID = 06 09 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 01, H = the 32-byte digest): NULL parameters with content: 30 33 30 0F <OID> 05 02 BE EF 04 20 <H> non-minimal DigestInfo length: 30 81 31 30 0D <OID> 05 00 04 20 <H> (canonical form: 30 31 30 0D <OID> 05 00 04 20 <H>) Long-form lengths are accepted the same way for the DigestAlgorithm, OID, NULL and digest fields. A signature whose EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 block (00 01 FF..FF 00 || DigestInfo) contains such an encoding verified as valid: `publicKey.verify(digest, signature)` returned true. Content bytes in the NULL parameters (reports used e.g. `05 40 <64 bytes>`) and similar slack give an attacker room to construct a forged signature for an e=3 key. With 1.4.1, verification throws "ASN.1 object does not contain a valid RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 DigestInfo value." Regression tests: tests/unit/rsa.js, "canonical DigestInfo checks". They use an e=1 key, so the signature equals the encoded block, with one test per non-canonical shape (also indefinite length, constructed and non-NULL parameters, padded OID subidentifiers) and two tests that the canonical encodings with and without NULL parameters still verify. Included in the 1.4.1 release. ### Impact Applications that verify RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signatures with node-forge: `publicKey.verify()` with the default scheme, and X.509 certificate and PKCS#7 signature verification, which use it. If the verifying RSA public key has a low public exponent (e=3), an attacker can forge a signature that verifies as valid, without the private key. Only keys with a small public exponent such as e=3 are practically affected.

CVSS vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CWE: CWE-347

This explanation was compiled automatically from the source records. Scores, active exploitation, patch and exploit status come straight from the sources.

IMPACT: Affected Products and Software

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-119192 vulnerability. Where our threat engine knows the exact affected versions, they are listed below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1npmnode-forge View
Total affected vendors: 1|Products: 1

RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check

Red Hat has not yet published a CSAF/VEX impact record for this CVE. This does not mean “not affected”.

SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
7.5CVSS 3.x—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory
0.0CVSS 4.0—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory

Patch and Remediation Guide

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Patch status unknown

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Confirm the affected product and version against the source evidence above.
Restrict access to internet-facing services and apply network segmentation.
Until a patch is confirmed, follow the vendor advisory; do not read an unknown status as “no patch”.
Monitor server logs and network endpoints for signs of anomalous execution.

Public exploit and active exploitation status

Verified exploit intelligence

No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.

Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-119192 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-119192 weaknesses.

Attack Vector and Accessibility

ExposureAğ üzerinden
PermissionsGerekmiyor
UserGerekmiyor

Official Sources and Advisories

CVSS Vector Radar Chart

7.5 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesNoneUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityNone

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredNone required
User InteractionNone required
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low
Integrity (Bütünlük)None
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)None

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Follow the vendor

N
npm logo
npm

Weakness Type (CWE & CAPEC)

Similar Vulnerabilities

Get this vulnerability through the API

Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-119192"