CVE Listesine Dön
CVE-2026-63202

netty-incubator-codec-ohttp BinaryHttpParser: Unauthenticated CPU-exhaustion DoS via infinite loop in field-section decoding

CVSS Skor

7.5

EPSS İhtimal

—

Risk Skoru

0.8

Yayın

1 ay önce

Resmî yama doğrulandı

Etkilenen ürün ve sürüm için yayımlanan güvenlik güncellemesini uygulayın.

Envanterimdeki Etkisi

Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.

Oturum kontrol ediliyor…

Zafiyet Açıklaması

DayBreach CVE AI Araştırması

CVE-2026-63202 için toplanan üretici, dağıtım, yama ve güvenlik kaynağı kayıtlarını karşılaştırıp kanıt bağlantılı bir açıklama hazırlayalım.

# BinaryHttpParser: Unauthenticated CPU-exhaustion DoS via infinite loop in field-section decoding - **ID:** BHTTP-LOOP-001 - **Severity:** High - **CVSS v3.1:** 7.5 — `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` - **CWE:** CWE-835 (Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition) — secondary CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) - **Affected component:** `codec-bhttp` → `io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser#readFieldSection`, file `codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java:619-626` - **Affected version:** netty-incubator-codec-ohttp HEAD `d3f2b49` (release `0.0.22.Final` + 3 commits). The loop has existed since the parser was introduced and is present in the latest code; all published advisory fixes are already applied. - **Reachable from:** `io.netty.incubator.codec.ohttp.OHttpRequestResponseContext$ContentDecoder#decodeChunk` (`codec-ohttp/.../OHttpRequestResponseContext.java:214`), i.e. the auto-wired OHTTP server **and** client codecs. - **Confidence:** High (empirically reproduced hang + thread dump against the unmodified parser). ## Summary `BinaryHttpParser` decodes Binary HTTP (RFC 9292) messages. An OHTTP gateway/client built on this library feeds the **decrypted** OHTTP body straight into `BinaryHttpParser.parse(...)`. The field-section decoding loop terminates only on the exact condition `fieldSectionLength != 0` and relies on a Java `assert` to guarantee forward progress. Because (a) the loop counter can be driven negative and (b) `readFieldLine(...)` legitimately consumes **zero** bytes and returns `null` on a truncated/over-long field line, the loop can spin forever. Assertions are disabled in any normal production JVM, so the two `assert` statements meant to catch this provide no protection. A single ~17-byte Binary HTTP message — encapsulated by an unauthenticated attacker inside a normal OHTTP request, using the gateway's **public** key configuration — pins one Netty event-loop thread at 100% CPU permanently. A handful of such requests exhausts the entire event-loop group and takes the OHTTP gateway (or client) fully offline. ## Root cause `BinaryHttpParser.java:619-626`: ```java HeaderType lastType = HeaderType.PSEUDO_HEADER; while (fieldSectionLength != 0) { // 619 — "!= 0", not "> 0" int readableBytes = in.readableBytes(); lastType = readFieldLine(in, headers, lastType, trailers); assert lastType != null; // 622 — no-op without -ea int read = readableBytes - in.readableBytes(); assert read > 0; // 624 — no-op without -ea fieldSectionLength -= read; // 625 } ``` Two cooperating defects: 1. **Counter can never hit zero.** `fieldSectionLength` is the *declared* field-section byte length read from the wire (line 592). The loop subtracts the bytes each `readFieldLine` actually consumes. If a field line consumes more bytes than the (attacker-understated) declared length, `fieldSectionLength` goes negative and `!= 0` stays true forever. 2. **Zero-progress iterations.** `readFieldLine` (lines 654-707) returns `null` **without consuming any bytes** when the remaining buffer cannot hold a complete field line — at lines 656, 664, 670, and 681 (the `in.skipBytes(sumBytes)` that advances the reader is only reached on the success path, line 705). When it returns `null`, `read == 0`, `fieldSectionLength` is unchanged, and the loop re-enters with identical state — a tight busy spin. The only constructs that would have stopped either case are the `assert` statements on lines 622 and 624, which the JVM strips unless started with `-ea`. Production deployments do not run with assertions enabled. ## Reachability (hop-by-hop, every guard resolved) Attacker model: OHTTP gateways publish their HPKE key configuration so that *any* client can encrypt requests to them. The attacker therefore encrypts a malicious BHTTP body under the gateway's public key — a perfectly valid OHTTP request. HPKE decapsulation succeeds; the plaintext is attacker-chosen. 1. `OHttpServerCodec.decode` → `OHttpRequestResponseContext.parse` → chunk decode → `ContentDecoder.decodeChunk`. 2. `OHttpRequestResponseContext.java:211` decrypts the chunk into `decryptedChunk`; line 212 cumulates it; **line 214** calls `binaryHttpParser.parse(binaryHttpCumulation, completeBodyReceived)` — attacker-controlled plaintext, no application code in between. 3. `parse` → `READ_KNOWN_LENGTH_REQUEST_HEAD` → `readRequestHead` (line 190). 4. `readRequestHead` reads the control data, then at lines 445-451 slices **all** remaining readable bytes as the field section and calls `readFieldSection(..., knownLength=true, maxFieldSectionSize)`. 5. Inside `readFieldSection`: - **Guard `checkFieldSectionTooLarge(fieldSectionLength, max)` (line 607):** bounds only the *declared* length, which the PoC sets to `1`. **Passes — not a barrier.** - **Guard `in.readableBytes() < sumBytes` (line 609):** `sumBytes` is built from the *declared* length, also tiny. **Passes — not a barrier.** - **Guards `assert` (lines 622, 624):** no-ops in production. **Defeated by default.** - Loop entered → spins forever (defects 1 + 2). No reachable guard bounds the *actual* consumption or forces progress. `maxFieldSectionSize` is irrelevant because the declared length is small and the loop is CPU-bound on a fixed, small buffer (no allocation, no memory growth to trip any size cap). ## Proof of concept (executed locally, benign liveness oracle) The real `codec-bhttp` sources were compiled unmodified against netty `4.1.135.Final` (the version pinned in `pom.xml`). The harness builds a valid known-length BHTTP request whose declared field-section length (`0x01`) is understated relative to the actual field line, then calls `parse(in, true)` on a worker thread with a 6-second watchdog. No payload, no side effects — purely a timing/CPU oracle. Malicious message (17 bytes): ``` 00 01 67 01 68 01 61 01 70 01 01 61 01 62 01 63 01 │ └method g └scheme h └auth a └path p │ └hdr a:b──┘ └ partial line └ framing 0 (known-length request) └ declared field-section length = 1 ``` Observed (production default, assertions OFF): ``` [*] malicious BHTTP bytes (17): 0001670168016101700101610162016301 [!!] HANG CONFIRMED: parse() still running after 6000 ms [!!] worker thread CPU time: 6029 ms (≈100% of one core => busy spin) [!!] worker stack (top frames): at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.readFieldSection(BinaryHttpParser.java:626) at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.readRequestHead(BinaryHttpParser.java:451) at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.parse(BinaryHttpParser.java:190) ``` CPU time ≈ wall time ⇒ a busy spin (RUNNABLE), not a blocked wait. Controls: - **Same input with `-ea`:** `parse()` throws `AssertionError` at `readFieldSection:624` immediately — proving the assertion is the only would-be guard and is absent in production. - **Well-formed request (declared length matches):** `parse()` returns `DefaultBinaryHttpRequest` promptly — proving the harness does not hang on valid input. PoC sources: `findings/netty-incubator-codec-ohttp/raw/Poc.java` (hang + control 1) and `raw/Poc2.java` (negative control). ## Impact Unauthenticated, pre-business-logic remote denial of service. Each malicious request permanently consumes one Netty event-loop thread at 100% CPU. Netty event-loop groups have a small fixed thread count (default `2 × cores`); a handful of requests exhausts every I/O thread, after which the gateway/client accepts no further connections and serves no traffic — a complete, persistent DoS that survives until process restart. Availability impact High; no confidentiality/integrity impact. ## Adversarial re-reading (attempts to refute) - *"`maxFieldSectionSize` caps it."* No — the declared length in the PoC is `1`; the cap (line 607) checks the declared value only. The spin happens on a 17-byte buffer with no allocation. Refutation fails. - *"An upstream HTTP size limit / `HttpObjectAggregator` blocks it."* No — the bug is CPU-bound, not memory-bound. The whole malicious message is tiny and well within any size limit. Refutation fails. - *"This is just CVE-2024-40642 (absent input validation)."* No — that advisory was about missing validation of method/scheme/authority/path enabling injection; that fix (the `ALLOWED_TOKEN`/`ALLOWED_SCHEME` validators, lines 76-122/461-466) is present and unrelated. This is a control-flow/termination defect in field-section length accounting. Distinct class, distinct code. - *"The hang might be a harness artifact."* No — the thread dump pinpoints `readFieldSection:626`; CPU≈wall confirms a spin; the `-ea` control throws at the exact assert; the well-formed control returns. The hang is for the claimed reason. - *"`completeBodyReceived` must be true."* Not required — the loop is inside `readFieldSection`, reached via `readRequestHead` once the control data is present, independent of that flag. The flag only affects a branch taken *after* `readRequestHead` returns `null`, which never happens here. No concrete blocker survived. Verdict: **CONFIRMED**. ## Remediation 1. Change the loop exit condition to `while (fieldSectionLength > 0)` so an overshoot (negative counter) terminates. 2. Treat a `null` / zero-progress return from `readFieldLine` while `fieldSectionLength > 0` as a hard framing error — throw `CorruptedFrameException("truncated or over-long field line")` instead of re-looping. 3. Reject any field line whose consumed byte count would drive `fieldSectionLength` below 0 (the declared length must be consumed exactly, per RFC 9292 §3.6). 4. Do not rely on `assert` for wire-format invariants on attacker-controlled input; assertions are disabled in production. Promote lines 622/624 to explicit exceptions. Example: ```java while (fieldSectionLength > 0) { int readableBytes = in.readableBytes(); lastType = readFieldLine(in, headers, lastType, trailers); int read = readableBytes - in.readableBytes(); if (lastType == null || read <= 0) { throw new CorruptedFrameException("truncated or over-long field line"); } if (read > fieldSectionLength) { throw new CorruptedFrameException("field line exceeds declared field-section length"); } fieldSectionLength -= read; } ``` ## Notes - The indeterminate-length field-section path (framing indicators 2/3) shares the same loop and the same `!= 0` / zero-progress structure; the fix above should cover both. A dedicated trace of `getIndeterminateLength` (lines 538-566) under non-default `maxFieldSectionSize` is recorded separately as a lead. - Default `maxFieldSectionSize` for the OHTTP codecs is `8 * 1024` (`OHttpCodecBuilder.DEFAULT_MAX_FIELD_SECTION_SIZE`), and is irrelevant to this CPU-bound spin.

IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-63202 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1mavenio.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp İncele
2mavenio.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp İncele
Total Affected Vendor: 1|Products: 2

RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü

Red Hat bu CVE için henüz bir CSAF/VEX etki kaydı yayımlamamış. Bu durum “etkilenmiyor” anlamına gelmez.

SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
7.5CVSS 3.x—Vektör yayımlanmadıGitHub Advisory
0.0CVSS 4.0—Vektör yayımlanmadıGitHub Advisory

Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Yama doğrulandı

1 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

osvio.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp0.0.23.Final

OSV düzeltilmiş sürüm: 0.0.23.Final

Etkilenen ürün ve sürümü yukarıdaki kaynak kanıtlarıyla doğrulayın.
İnternete açık servislerde erişimi kısıtlayın ve ağ segmentasyonu uygulayın.
Kanıtta belirtilen resmî güncellemeyi yalnızca eşleşen ürün ve sürüme uygulayın.
Sunucu günlüklerini ve ağ uçlarını anormal çalıştırma belirtileri için izleyin.

Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu

Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı

Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.

Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-63202 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-63202 weaknesses.

Saldırı Vektörü ve Erişilebilirlik Karakteristiği

ErişimAğ üzerinden
YetkiGerekmiyor
KullanıcıGerekmiyor

Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri

CVSS Vektör Radar Grafiği

7.5 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesNoneUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityHigh

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack VectorNetwork (Ağ)
Attack ComplexityLow (Düşük)
Privileges RequiredNone (Gerekmiyor)
User InteractionNone (Gerekmiyor)
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low (Düşük)
Integrity (Bütünlük)None (Yok)
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)High (Yüksek)

Yama doğrulandı

1 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

Üreticiyi takip et

M
maven logo
maven

Zafiyet Türü (CWE & CAPEC)

İlgili Benzer Açıklar

Bu açığı API ile alın

Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-63202"