CVE Listesine Dön
CVE-2026-89762

apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()

CVSS Skor

7.8

EPSS İhtimal

%0.1

Risk Skoru

0.0

Yayın

1 ay önce

Yama durumu henüz doğrulanamadı

Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Envanterimdeki Etkisi

Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.

Oturum kontrol ediliyor…

Zafiyet Açıklaması

DayBreach CVE AI Araştırması

CVE-2026-89762 için toplanan üretici, dağıtım, yama ve güvenlik kaynağı kayıtlarını karşılaştırıp kanıt bağlantılı bir açıklama hazırlayalım.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section() AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an updated version that uses a new label. The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of `struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces creds, like so: ``` const struct cred *cred = current_cred(); alloc_file_pseudo(...); uid_t uid = cred->euid; ``` I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF. The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label() runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if `current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the objective creds. So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong: 1. task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds), with refcount=2 2. task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding 3. task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old subjective creds (<creds A>) 4. task enters AppArmor LSM hook 5. AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal 6. AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on <creds A> 7. task leaves AppArmor LSM hook 8. task calls revert_creds(<creds A>) 9. now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B> 10. another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for overriding, refcount drops to 0 11. now task->real_cred points to freed creds At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF. I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice() resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall results in a KASAN UAF splat. To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of the new label.) Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write(). There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over. I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make bugs more obvious.

IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-89762 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1linuxLinux İncele
2linuxLinux İncele
Total Affected Vendor: 1|Products: 2

RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü

Red Hat bu CVE için henüz bir CSAF/VEX etki kaydı yayımlamamış. Bu durum “etkilenmiyor” anlamına gelmez.

SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
7.8CVSS V3_1HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVE CNA
7.8CVSS V31HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HNVD

Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Etkilenen ürün ve sürümü yukarıdaki kaynak kanıtlarıyla doğrulayın.
İnternete açık servislerde erişimi kısıtlayın ve ağ segmentasyonu uygulayın.
Yama doğrulanana kadar üretici bültenini izleyin; bilinmeyen durumu “yama yok” olarak yorumlamayın.
Sunucu günlüklerini ve ağ uçlarını anormal çalıştırma belirtileri için izleyin.

Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu

Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı

Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.

Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-89762 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-89762 weaknesses.

Saldırı Vektörü ve Erişilebilirlik Karakteristiği

ErişimYerel erişim
YetkiDüşük
KullanıcıGerekmiyor

Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri

CVSS Vektör Radar Grafiği

7.8 / 10
Attack VectorLocalComplexityLowPrivilegesLowUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityHigh

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack VectorLocal (Yerel)
Attack ComplexityLow (Düşük)
Privileges RequiredLow (Düşük Yetki)
User InteractionNone (Gerekmiyor)
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low (Düşük)
Integrity (Bütünlük)None (Yok)
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)High (Yüksek)

Yama durumu bilinmiyor

İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.

Üreticiyi takip et

L
linux logo
linux

İlgili Benzer Açıklar

Bu açığı API ile alın

Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-89762"