CVE Listesine Dön
CVE-2026-64374Otomatik saldırıya uygun · CISA

sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT

CVSS Skor

7.5

EPSS İhtimal

%0.4

Risk Skoru

0.0

Yayın

2 ay önce

Resmî yama doğrulandı

Etkilenen ürün ve sürüm için yayımlanan güvenlik güncellemesini uygulayın.

Envanterimdeki Etkisi

Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.

Oturum kontrol ediliyor…

Zafiyet Açıklaması

DayBreach CVE AI Araştırması

CVE-2026-64374 için toplanan üretici, dağıtım, yama ve güvenlik kaynağı kayıtlarını karşılaştırıp kanıt bağlantılı bir açıklama hazırlayalım.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT RT migration is done aggressively. When a CPU schedules out a high priority RT task for a lower priority task, it will look to see if there's any RT tasks that are waiting to run on another CPU that is of higher priority than the task this CPU is about to run. If it finds one, it will pull that task over to the CPU and allow it to run there instead. Normally, this pulling is done by looking at the RT overloaded mask (rto) which contains all the CPUs in the scheduler domain with RT tasks that are waiting to run due to a higher priority RT task currently running on their CPU. The CPU that is about to schedule a lower priority task will grab the rq lock of the overloaded CPU and move the RT task from that CPU's runqueue to the local one and schedule the higher priority RT task. This caused issues when a lot of CPUs would schedule a lower priority task at the same time. They would all try to grab the same runqueue lock of the CPU with the overloaded RT tasks. Only the first CPU that got in will get that task. All the others would wait until they got the runqueue lock and see there's nothing to pull and do nothing. On systems with lots of CPUs, this caused a large latency (up to 500us) which is beyond what PREEMPT_RT is to allow. The solution to that was to create an RT_PUSH_IPI logic. When any CPU wanted to pull a task, instead of grabbing the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, it would start by sending an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and that IPI handler would have the CPU with the waiting RT task do a push instead. Then that handler would send an IPI to the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks, and so on. Note, after the first CPU starts this process, if another CPU wanted to do a pull, it would see that the process has already begun and would only increment a counter to have the IPIs continue again. The RT_PUSH_IPI solved the latency problem with PREEMPT_RT but could cause a new issue with non PREEMPT_RT. Namely, softirqs run in a threaded context on PREEMPT_RT but they can run in an interrupt context in non-RT. If an IPI lands on a CPU that has just woken up multiple RT tasks and the current CPU is running a non RT or a low priority RT task, instead of doing a push, it would simply do a schedule on that CPU. But if a softirq was also executing on this CPU, the schedule would need to wait until the softirq finished. Until then, the CPU would still be considered overloaded as there are RT tasks still waiting to run on it. A live lock occurred on a workload that was doing heavy networking traffic on a large machine where the softirqs would run 500us out of 750us. And it would also be waking up RT tasks, causing the RT pull logic to be constantly executed. When a softirq triggered on a CPU with RT tasks queued but not running yet, and the other CPUs would see this CPU as being overloaded, they would send an IPI over to it. The CPU would notice that the waiting RT tasks are of higher priority than the currently running task and simply schedule that CPU instead. But because the softirq was executing, before it could schedule, it would receive another IPI to do the same. The amount of IPIs would slow down the currently running softirq so much that before it could return back to task context, it would execute another softirq never allowing the CPU to schedule. This live locked that CPU. As RT_PUSH_IPI was created to help PREEMPT_RT, make it default off if PREEMPT_RT is not enabled.

IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-64374 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1linuxLinux İncele
2linuxLinux İncele
3linuxlinux kernel İncele
4linuxlinux kernel İncele
5linuxlinux kernel İncele
6linuxlinux kernel İncele
7linuxlinux kernel İncele
8linuxlinux kernel İncele
9linuxlinux kernel İncele
Total Affected Vendor: 1|Products: 9

RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü

Red Hat bu CVE için henüz bir CSAF/VEX etki kaydı yayımlamamış. Bu durum “etkilenmiyor” anlamına gelmez.

SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
7.5CVSS V31HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HNVD
7.5CVSS V3_1HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVE CNA
5.5CVSS 3.x—CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HMicrosoft MSRC

Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Yama doğrulandı

8 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
Etkilenen ürün ve sürümü yukarıdaki kaynak kanıtlarıyla doğrulayın.
İnternete açık servislerde erişimi kısıtlayın ve ağ segmentasyonu uygulayın.
Kanıtta belirtilen resmî güncellemeyi yalnızca eşleşen ürün ve sürüme uygulayın.
Sunucu günlüklerini ve ağ uçlarını anormal çalıştırma belirtileri için izleyin.

Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu

Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı

Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.

Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-64374 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-64374 weaknesses.

Saldırı Vektörü ve Erişilebilirlik Karakteristiği

ErişimAğ üzerinden
YetkiGerekmiyor
KullanıcıGerekmiyor

Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri

CVSS Vektör Radar Grafiği

7.5 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesNoneUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityHigh

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack VectorNetwork (Ağ)
Attack ComplexityLow (Düşük)
Privileges RequiredNone (Gerekmiyor)
User InteractionNone (Gerekmiyor)
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low (Düşük)
Integrity (Bütünlük)None (Yok)
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)High (Yüksek)

Yama doğrulandı

8 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

Üreticiyi takip et

L
linux logo
linux

Zafiyet Türü (CWE & CAPEC)

İlgili Benzer Açıklar

Bu açığı API ile alın

Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-64374"