CVE Listesine Dön
CVE-2025-38472Otomatik saldırıya uygun · CISA

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry

CVSS Skor

9.8

EPSS İhtimal

%0.4

Risk Skoru

0.0

Yayın

1 yıl önce

Resmî yama doğrulandı

Etkilenen ürün ve sürüm için yayımlanan güvenlik güncellemesini uygulayın.

Envanterimdeki Etkisi

Yalnızca hesabınıza eklediğiniz kişisel ürünler değerlendirilir; kurumsal envanter burada görünmez.

Oturum kontrol ediliyor…

Zafiyet Açıklaması

DayBreach CVE AI Araştırması

CVE-2025-38472 için toplanan üretici, dağıtım, yama ve güvenlik kaynağı kayıtlarını karşılaştırıp kanıt bağlantılı bir açıklama hazırlayalım.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---

IMPACT — Etkilenen Ürünler ve Yazılımlar

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2025-38472 vulnerability. Even if our threat engine is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is represented below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1linuxLinux İncele
2linuxLinux İncele
3linuxlinux kernel İncele
4linuxlinux kernel İncele
5linuxlinux kernel İncele
6linuxlinux kernel İncele
7linuxlinux kernel İncele
8debiandebian linux İncele
Total Affected Vendor: 2|Products: 8

RED HAT CSAF/VEX — Ürün Etki Kontrolü

Red Hat bu CVE için henüz bir CSAF/VEX etki kaydı yayımlamamış. Bu durum “etkilenmiyor” anlamına gelmez.

SCORING — CVSS Çoklu Kaynak Skoru

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
9.8CVSS V31CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HNVD
9.8CVSS V3_1CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVE CNA
5.5CVSS V31MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HNVD

Yama ve İyileştirme Rehberi (Solution)

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Yama doğrulandı

5 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
nvd

NVD tarafından Patch olarak etiketlenmiş referans

Kaynağı aç
Etkilenen ürün ve sürümü yukarıdaki kaynak kanıtlarıyla doğrulayın.
İnternete açık servislerde erişimi kısıtlayın ve ağ segmentasyonu uygulayın.
Kanıtta belirtilen resmî güncellemeyi yalnızca eşleşen ürün ve sürüme uygulayın.
Sunucu günlüklerini ve ağ uçlarını anormal çalıştırma belirtileri için izleyin.

Public exploit ve aktif sömürü durumu

Doğrulanmış exploit istihbaratı

Bu CVE için henüz doğrulanmış public PoC, exploit repository’si veya Metasploit modülü bulunamadı.

Zafiyet Dağılımı ve Saldırı Kalıpları (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2025-38472 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2025-38472 weaknesses.

Saldırı Vektörü ve Erişilebilirlik Karakteristiği

ErişimAğ üzerinden
YetkiGerekmiyor
KullanıcıGerekmiyor

Resmi Kaynaklar ve Danışma Bültenleri

CVSS Vektör Radar Grafiği

9.8 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesNoneUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityHigh

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack VectorNetwork (Ağ)
Attack ComplexityLow (Düşük)
Privileges RequiredNone (Gerekmiyor)
User InteractionNone (Gerekmiyor)
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low (Düşük)
Integrity (Bütünlük)None (Yok)
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)High (Yüksek)

Yama doğrulandı

5 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

Üreticiyi takip et

L
linux logo
linux
D
debian logo
debian

Zafiyet Türü (CWE & CAPEC)

İlgili Benzer Açıklar

Bu açığı API ile alın

Etkilenen ürünler, sürüm aralıkları, istismar durumu ve yama bilgisi tek istekte; ücretsiz anahtarla.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.daybreach.dev/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2025-38472"